Subscription expired
RSSbox powered by rssinclude.com

--



CLICK HERE PLACE YOUR ADS ON AMPED STATUS




--
AmpedStatus Report )))

The Battle Over Medical Marijuana

June 3rd, 2009 | Filed under Activism, Drugs, Health, News, Politics & Government . Follow comments through RSS 2.0 feed. Click here to comment, or trackback.

Email This Email This - Print This Print This

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to Digg Post to StumbleUpon

By Hoa Quach, Global Voices

Photo by Neeta Lind on Flickr

Photo by Neeta Lind on Flickr

In the United States, 13 states currently allow citizens to use marijuana for medicinal purposes, but even these limited rights are under threat. In response, many Americans have created blogs to support and extend the legalization of marijuana.

The American debate over legalizing marijuana (cannabis) can be traced back to the early 1900s when people began using it for recreational purposes. More than one hundred years have passed and the debate hasn’t loss one ounce of heat.

State vs. federal law in courts

In February, Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the federal government would no longer raid medical marijuana clubs that abide by state laws. Despite this announcement, those opposing the drug are still fighting the battle. Most recently, a Republican Senator in Oklahoma, Tom Coburn, introduced an amendment to a bill that would force states to abide by the federal government, which has not yet passed a bill to legalize marijuana nationwide. The amendment failed to pass by a narrow vote on May 21.

A blogger for NORML Daily Stash, Dudemaster, quoted from an article on Opposing Views by Americans for Safe Access about the foiled attempt to stop medical marijuana:

“At present, the only way for medical marijuana to be properly evaluated by the FDA is for privately-funded sponsors to conduct FDA-approved clinical trials (like any other drug evaluation). If Senator Coburn’s intentions with regard to the medical efficacy of marijuana were genuine, he would consider first removing the monopoly imposed by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) on licenses for the cultivation of medical-grade cannabis for research purposes. Currently, the DEA exclusively licenses the cultivation of medical-grade cannabis to the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA), which primarily investigates only the negative effects of cannabis. This monopoly obstructs any investigation and research in the U.S. into the medical properties of cannabis and thwarts the normal drug approval process.

In California, a longtime legal battle also came to an end earlier this month. Two counties, San Diego and San Bernardino, attempted to overturn a 1996 state law that allows the medical usage of marijuana by bringing the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. They lost the case on May 18. Scott Morgan of the Stop the Drug War Organization blogged about the counties’ court loss:

“For the hundredth time, conflict with federal law is not an obstacle to passing and implementing state laws that permit medical marijuana. Federal law enforcement can come in and cause trouble, but that doesn’t make state laws invalid. Those laws still apply and provide valuable protection against state police, who patients are more likely to come in contact with.

The very idea that federal law somehow cancels out state policies is just some made-up nonsense that enemies of medical marijuana have been spewing in desperation for several years now. Nice try, but you’re wrong. Case closed.”

Medical marijuana club in San Francisco, by Thomas Hawk on Flickr

Medical marijuana club in San Francisco, by Thomas Hawk on Flickr

Joe Elford from Americans for Safe Access blogged at Medical Cannabis: Voices from the frontlines about his experience in a court room in California on May 26 where he presented an oral argument in favor of medical marijuana. The case concerns a group of cannabis patients who claim to have been harassed by the sheriff’s department.

I had an oral argument before the Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District, which is a state court in Sacramento. The case is Williams v. Butte County , which involves a small patient collective, which was harassed by the Butte County Sheriff’s Office. Specifically, Williams and six other patients pooled their labor and resources to maintain a 41-plant garden on Williams’ property. During one of the notorious Butte County sweeps several years ago, Deputy Sheriff Jacob Hancock came to Williams’ property without a warrant and required him to tear down all but twelve of the plants upon threat of arrest…

Blogging for marijuana rights

Although medical marijuana is legal in California, only 12 other states have adopted the same policy. This leaves many advocates constantly campaigning to legalize the drug nationwide. Advocates have taken their protest to the blogosphere, often listing the many reasons why marijuana is beneficial.

On the blog of the Marijuana Policy Project, MPP Blog, Bruce Mirken presents a study that shows cannabis can help against colorectal cancer, and insists that medical marijuana “is not just about getting high”.

The Stimulist gives five reasons why he think marijuana will be legalized – including the fact that baby boomers are growing older; the decline in the popularity of the drug war; and the economic benefits:

“California’s economy is hurting, and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is looking for any way he can to make some money. San Quentin and the L.A. Coliseum are for sale, but the most drastic measure he’s taken is calling for a study on legalizing dope. “Creating extra revenues, I’m always for an open debate on it,” he said earlier this month.”

Entire online news communities about marijuana have been created, including maps that show users where to find the nearest cannabis clubs,  photo sharing communities and forums.

Despite, its many supporters – opposition is still strong and therefore, a federal law legalizing marijuana may be far down the road. Deb-HAS-grn write a forum post at Green Passion about a conversation she had recently with her son.

“I was talking to my son a few months ago about my love of growing and my new place on the internet, Green Passion, I also was saying to him, As I get older my desire to need to see pot legalized grows stronger and stronger. His words responding to that should not of surprised me as I have thought the same myself, but at the time when he said to me, Mom I am sorry to say this but I honestly don’t think they will legalize marijuana for many many years to come. It kind of hit me hard hearing those words and thinking I may never see the day that I would be legal to grow and smoke as I please. And I am not talking about the first much needed legalization of medical marijuana in all countries, I am talking about the freedom to do as I please when I please when it comes to weed.”

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to Digg Post to StumbleUpon

Email This Email This - Print This Print This


Facebook Comments:

5 Responses - Place Your Comment:

    Previous Comments:

  1. OfCourseLegalize said:

    A very relevant, yet underplayed component to the issue of marijuana legalization is generational, which might well be a gamechanger. Obama, and many of his key appointees, are members of Generation Jones-—born 1954-1965, between the Boomers and Generation X. Many top national commentators (from Newsweek, NBC, CNN, etc.) have spoken about the importance and relevance of GenJones as the new generation of leadership; this could be a gamechanger re. the drug issue for at least two reasons:

    1) Jonesers are by far the biggest pot smokers compared to the other generations. While Boomers are associated with pot, it was only a small, albeit very visible, segment of Boomers who actually smoked pot back in the day. Govt. and independent studies show that Jonesers as teens (in the 1970s) smoked 15 to 20 times more pot than Boomers did as teens. And not only did Jonesers smoke much more grass than any other generation of teens in US history, but still today–in middle-age–smoke it a remarkable amount. The data is really striking.

    2) One of the key collective personality traits consistently attributed to Jonesers is their pragmatism; they are far likelier to put aside ideology and deal with drugs in a realistic and practical way.

    Here’s a page with a good recent overview about GenJones:
    http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html

    If ever there was a generation of leadership open to legalizing pot, it probably is Generation Jones. And if there ever was a time that the country might be open to this change in drug laws, perhaps it’s now…

  2. buds420 said:

    visit http://www.buds420.com for legal marijuana and more!

  3. [...] ampedstatus.com/the-battle-over-medical-marijuana [...]

  4. A sourcing agent has had the opportunity to produce its know-how through onsite experience and
    interface with Chinese manufacturers. Honestly, it sometimes may seem like time of
    day affects my Gmail access. Avoid handbags with tag words that state
    “Authentic Marc Jacobs”. Terpene resins is especially consumed in domestic market, and
    also other derivatives including synthetic camphor, synthetic borneol,
    terpeneol, pine oil and synthetic perfume are generally for export.

  5. We informed you before paying for naturopathic medicine
    students study a basic medical care. History of Alternative Medicines for Mesothelioma This
    resource from Asbestos. However, there are no
    longer contains any live korean culture organisms.
    This condition is caused by the relief of” Mind controlling the painful, widespread Inflammatory Bowel Disease known as psoriatic arthritis. Pamela Kopecky is a by product instructions to reduce their profits. You korean culture need cholesterol to maintain their market share in America as powerful alternative medicines.

5 Responses - Place Your Comment:





-------------------
Since February 2010, we have built the 99% Movement by surviving off of individual donations from people like you. Unlike most other so-called "independent" sites, we are not funded by partisan foundations or political organizations. We are fiercely independent and committed to citizen empowerment through the dissemination of critical information.

If you respect our work, please get a subscription here:



You can also make a one-time donation here.

Your information will be kept confidential.

If you have any questions, please e-mail AmpedStatus[@]AmpedStatus.com.

Our future is in your hands.


----- -------------------