If you have been watching Anonymous’ posts he sais he does not want to lead. But at the same time he is pushing us towards a goal. After all, he is providing us with the videos and the march 28th plans of demonstration at the fed in US. I think what he wants is to…if you will, turn us all into leaders. To have one centralised leader a group can be destroyed. What happens when every member of our organization becomes a leader. You simply cannot win. So I think the point of this forum is to get information out… and to slowly and methodically bring leaders from everywhere to the forefront. Turning everyday people like me and you into activists because we are so outraged at the level of bullshit the people at the top are feeding us that we just cant sit by any longer and watch as if we were stupid. Thats what I have done and that is what everyone on this forum should start to do. Stop Beleiving that by posting something here everyday change is going to happen. People on this forum already agree …. so it does no good congratulating ourselves on what we found today. Start getting the word out. make a new facebook. post shit where people will see it. participate in the rally if you can. things like that. Be your own leader and use anon as a symbol.

I think what we can imply from all the scrambled mess of jarg you can hear on this forum… is that YES we all agree that we need to do something about the FED. The problem is no cohesiveness. Everyone here is simply giving their argument to why this system is corrupt. But each of the arguments fed by different people are in a vast spectrum of ranges that…. when you REALLY break it down all end up coming back to world government agencies… Its just that everyone is so self motivated that they think their issue is the most important. Wake up people. Every one of these posts talking about corruption, poverty, lack of morals, and the like can ALL be traced back to the fed reserve. Instead of bashing people for having no collective concious, lets try to hel them realise this truth and direct our fury from every aspect of life towards the international governments such as the fed.

Yo Anon and others on this forum. check out this vid….. seems like a lot of others are having same thoughts. Maybe we need to connect/collaborate with this person and use some of the ideas. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/revealed-the-lefts-economic-terrorism-playbook-the-chase-campaign-for-a-coalition-of-unions-community-groups-lawmakers-and-students-to-take-down-us-capitalism-and-redistribute-wealth-power/

Ok guys. Probably going to recieve a lot of shit for this. LIBYA. I havent heard much talk of libya on this forum as of yet but I just cant keep it in anymore. Does anyone else agree with me when I say this whole SCANDAL is just another toehold for the United States/ UN for oil. Hear me out. I will list some of the RATIONAL thoughts I have had on this whole story, as well as reasons why we have no business being in Libya, As I have been watching the news, and doing some research. This is a very hastily drawn up conclusion and hold more opinion than fact, but I feel like it makes all too much sense. First and foremost… In regards to Muammar Gaddafi; In no way shape or form, am I saying that this man is not a dictator, or that he is innocent. Lets get down to some basic a99-101 theories though. We can all agree that media is the most usefull tool in political propoganda that is used to justify all sorts of political agenda can we not? So we have our first premise in order. This situation became political, despite its humanitarianism call to action, the MINUTE the UN decided to use MILITARY action. Therefore, the media’s coverage of this event, if we use rational thinking does not shift from its position as a TOOL of propoganda used in justying military action. Here is where I focus on whats been playing out in the media. So the main justification we have here is Gaddafi killing innocents, ( cant say whether this is true or not). But I have also been watching stories of reporters who have been talking to citizens of Libya, claiming that the people of libya are against Gaddafi and that they are afraid of him and all the terror whatnots of why hes insane. Here is my problem…. these reports are coming from citizens that are not being broadcasted, when they do broadcast sound clips these people have suprisingly good english and quite frankly seem to be giving the justifications that are exactly what needs to be heard to justify our cause … call me ignorant but these people speak in a very particular grammer that suggest years of english understanding. I would like to poke a hole in this media coverage because after doing some research I came to the conclusion that a very small percentage of the actual people would have an understanding of english such as I am hearing. We are talking about a third world country, whose people have limited telecommunications, and heavily controlled internet access. For news agencies to waltz into the middle of a war zone and pick a random citizen out of the populace that just happens to have such a great understanding of the use of this language, and then in turn say … in my opinon ,exactly what needs to be said in justification, is really far fetched. Then we come to the more recent talk of TERRORISM. Isn’t terrorism the exact same reason we went into Iraq. Supposed reports now indicate that we need to watch out for acts of terrorism from Gaddafi, claiming that he threatened the US. Poking hole number two. I heard the Speech Gaddafi made to the world the night of the UN’s proclomation of operation Odyysey Dawn. In no way shape or form did he indicate an ATTACK. What he clearly said was, The libyan people will not tolerate an invasion from the allied forces, and that they will fight inch by inch to keep the western countries out of libya. Wich brings me to my next form of rational thinking. In his speech Gaddafi sais, ”You will not have our oil”. I find it very odd that, within minutes of this proclamation, we have jets begin to take out military targets in libya. Once again you can point to humanitarian reasons, but in my opinion actions speak much louder than words. If you recall, president obama initially states his intent of limited involvement and indicision on the matter. Yet, Immediately once Gaddafi makes his speech indicating that the rest of the world will no longer recieve its oil, we are Immediately prepared for attack. This suggests planning. You cant just scramble a few jets into action and start taking out military targets with precise strategy in place, within a few minutes.There are all sorts of protocal, safety measures and planning that go into these sorts of things, or at least thats the idea our leaders present to us. And believe me when I say MINUTES. I did not go to bed and I was watching the story as it all unfolded. Within minutes! As I said these are opinion based arguments, using rational thinking. But now that I get that out of the way lets take a look at some other apsects of why I believe America is getting duped once again. We are there to oust Gaddafi because he is killing innocents. What about Bahrain and Yemen. Isn’t the same sort of thing taking place. Why have we not declared operation steal oil in Bahrrain and Yemen… oh… maybe because there is none? Check out http://www.indexmundi.com, look at oil production for libya, yemen, and bahrain. These are reports given by the CIA so… pretty hard to contradict here right? These are the kinds of thoughts that roam through my head when I listen to the news here in America. As I said before, I am not saying that Gaddafi is innocent, I am simply saying use your brains. It doesnt matter what the media tells us. What matters is following the action of other nations based on WHATS REAL. There are a number of other issues that I cant exactly nail down but its safe to say the longer I watch CNN the more I smell mischeif in the air. So lets get out of the topic of opinion and move into some more concrete information.

Hmmmmmmm.. The us declares war on libya…. in the middle of the night…. without approval from congress…. really? Isnt that the sort of thing that is supposed to be carefully considered and I dont know.. outside the bounds of presidency alone? After doing some research I find that if you want to speak in technical terms….. No it is not outside the bounds of presidancy because of the fact that we are involved with the UN. As a UN member, all UN mandates overide the laws of the land. So once UN mandates war we have no choice in the matter. BUUUUT as sen Ron. paul points out, a UN mandate is essentially a treaty, and NO TREATY CAN OVERIDE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION BY LAW, therefore we are going to war unconstitutionally. Go ahead and watch this video im about to post. Very good argument given by Ron paul as to why we shouldnt be there in the first place. I honestly have no idea who decided to post this, but its VERY clear that as soon as Sen Paul begins to connect the dots and actually provide some good insight as to why we should not be there… he is suddenly cut off… hmmm.. strange. Could it be that our media is filtering out thoughts it does not want out in our population?

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2011/03/21/exp.arena.libya.ron.paul.cnn?hpt=T2

So there you have it…. very hastily drawn up conclusions mixed with some fact about why this whole thing is just another textbook operation to gain a strategic offshore position in conjunction with oil. PLEEEASE dont be afraid to bash me on this one guys. I need some critisism if you can provide it…… Im going to make a prediction that, even if the US is out soon, The UN will maintain its position in libya. To go in, oust a leader and bomb the crap out of its structures without some sort of rebuild effort is even more retarted. Whats key here is that the UN is the place of power for the world bank IMF and such and such. So it doesnt necessarily have to be US.